<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Thriller Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thrillermag.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thrillermag.com</link>
	<description>Thrilling interviews with thrilling musicians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:01:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Literature and Music</title>
		<link>http://www.thrillermag.com/uncategorized/literature-and-music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thrillermag.com/uncategorized/literature-and-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thriller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thrillermag.com/?p=2838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It seems like it would be hard to pick two art forms that have less to do with each other than music and literature.  One involves listening to sounds, the other involves silently reading words.  But, there is a certain music in language, and often, there is great language attached to music.  This edition of Thriller [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ffffff; font: normal normal normal 13px/19px Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-family: Times; line-height: normal; font-size: medium; padding: 0.6em; margin: 0px;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ML.jpg"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 3px solid black;" title="ML" src="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ML.jpg" alt="ML" width="500" height="333" /></a><span style="color: #000000;">It seems like it would be hard to pick two art forms that have less to do with each other than music and literature.  One involves listening to sounds, the other involves silently reading words.  But, there is a certain music in language, and often, there is great language attached to music.  This edition of <em>Thriller</em> looks at both sides of . . .<span id="more-2838"></span>the issue.  First, in our interview with <strong>Ben Folds</strong>, we discuss what it was like to pair up with author Nick Hornby and make an album where Folds wrote the music to Hornby&#8217;s lyrics.  Folds, of course, is most famous for his excellent work with Ben Folds Five.  Hornby wrote <em>High Fidelity</em>, which was made into a movie that made Jack Black a star.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;">Next, <em>Thriller</em> contributor Ashley Belanger examines Thomas Pynchon&#8217;s <em>Gravity&#8217;s Rainbow</em>, one of the pillars of postmodern fiction, and one of the greatest books ever written.  The book is full of songs&#8211;lyrics, more accurately&#8211;but clearly the intent is for the reader to hear as well as read.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;">As always check out <strong>The Playlist</strong> and all the other fun pages.</span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thrillermag.com/uncategorized/literature-and-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Literature and Music - Ben Folds, Gravity's Rainbow]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Folds &#8211; on collaborating with Nick Hornby</title>
		<link>http://www.thrillermag.com/uncategorized/ben-folds-on-collaborating-with-nick-hornby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thrillermag.com/uncategorized/ben-folds-on-collaborating-with-nick-hornby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thriller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thrillermag.com/?p=2821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 


*FEATURES AUDIO/MULTIMEDIA*
It seems a bit bizarre that it took Ben Folds so long to do a project where he wrote the music to another person&#8217;s lyrics.  After all . . .Folds&#8217; entire career is heavily indebted to Elton John, who made his own career out of writing songs to Bernie Taupin&#8217;s lyrics.  Perhaps Folds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div style="background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ffffff; font: normal normal normal 13px/19px Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-family: Times; line-height: normal; font-size: medium; padding: 0.6em; margin: 0px;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/BN4.jpg"><span style="color: #000000;"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 2px solid black;" title="BN4" src="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/BN4.jpg" alt="BN4" width="560" height="375" /></span></a></p>
<h6 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">*FEATURES AUDIO/MULTIMEDIA*</span></h6>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;"><em>It seems a bit bizarre that it took Ben Folds so long to do a project where he wrote the music to another person&#8217;s lyrics.  After all . . .<span id="more-2821"></span>Folds&#8217; entire career is heavily indebted to Elton John, who made his own career out of writing songs to Bernie Taupin&#8217;s lyrics.  Perhaps Folds was just waiting for the right writing partner.  He found that partner in British novelist, Nick Hornby (</em>High Fidelity; About A Boy; Juliet, Naked<em>).  The two men began collaborating more than two years ago, and eventually produced the album</em>, Lonely Avenue<em>, in 2010.  Folds spoke to </em>Thriller<em> just before the album&#8217;s release about working with Hornby and writing music to another man&#8217;s words.</em></span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">How did you approach recording the album?</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">I was the producer, and we kept an uncomfortable amount of space in the recordings as we tracked them.  We would track very live, but then we would leave assloads of space, and the reason I did that is because I love Paul Buckmaster’s arrangements, but he’s very busy.  He normally gets tossed onto a very full track, and I just thought this could be really powerful if we left an uncomfortable amount of space.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/BN2.jpg"><img style="float: left; border: 3px solid black;" title="BN2" src="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/BN2-300x180.jpg" alt="BN2" width="300" height="180" /></a>So you wrote sparse arrangements on purpose?</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">Yeah, just bars of not much going on – but keeping the energy, you know?  Make sure it’s not dying.  But then, people would hear it as it was being worked on and always weren’t so sure why it was so minimal.  Now, I think it’s just right.  Paul just went Hiawatha on that shit [<em>laughs</em>].</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">It reminds me of John Lennon’s goal while making <em>Plastic Ono Band</em>, to just strip everything down to its rawest state.  He talked about how even just a piano has so many overtones in it that you could leave it by itself and it’s like a whole orchestra.</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">Yeah, that seems to have been almost his lifelong artistic goal – to just sometimes painfully simplify and simplify.  I can understand that.  What becomes the challenge then is keeping it standing upright with energy, because obviously you can go, “Hey, I need some energy,” and just go nuts.  In fact, I would say the production of some of these songs is kind of similar to some of those John Lennon songs.  As a kid, sometimes I didn’t like that.  You know, there are songs on some of his studio albums that are just like, [<em>sings a few notes</em>] – just nothing going on, and you kind of want some candy [<em>laughs</em>].  That’s what we did when we practiced.  The other thing I think that does is it forces the singer to carry it.  It’s got to be carried that way.  At the end of the day, though, since I had an extremely involved string arranger on this record, then at that point it doesn’t have that kind of minimalist thing.  But, as far as the rhythm section goes, yeah, that was some discipline.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Your songs usually have such complex, pretty chords in them.  Was it hard to simplify that, especially writing on piano where you can just add notes to chords almost endlessly?</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Ben1-Output-Stereo1.mp3" target="_blank&gt;&lt;SPAN STYLE=">*CLICK TO LISTEN*</a> Well, when you play a pretty chord, if you know anything at all about piano, you know you can play all of the notes in the chord, or you can drop most of them except for the one note, like a seventh or something, that made it pretty.  And you can voice then the third into some other voice somewhere – even the top of a bass guitar or a cello.  This one was a little more minimalist literally in that there’s more single line stuff going on musically.  The reason for that was that I was working with Nick Hornby’s lyrics, and I just had to – sort of on an intuitive level – I had to find a way to make his words speak without distraction.  Because, you could read them and they were great.  So, the last thing the fuck I wanted to do was to put on the record, and to realize that I would rather read them, you know?  He probably sells more books than I do records, so we don’t want to take the thing that’s great about him and not enhance it.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">So, you saw yourself as a sort of mouthpiece for his words.</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Ben2-Output-Stereo1.mp3" target="_blank&gt;&lt;SPAN STYLE=">*CLICK TO LISTEN*</a> Yeah, kind of like with a P.A. system, a public address system – if the drums are loud enough without the system, then you only use the system to turn the singer up.  That’s kind of the way I was doing it with his lyrics.  If the lyric was loud enough by itself, then it just didn’t need help, so it doesn’t get help.  Then, I had to be real selfless about it and go, “Well, I could look at this as Ben Folds and Nick Hornby, and I could make sure that my music is going to get some attention,” or I could just go, “This really needs to tell a story.”  And, if someone wants to say, “God, that song made me cry, but man the music was stupid.  It was so simple, it was just boring.”  Great.  That’s awesome.  If they cried, or they laughed or they were moved by the lyrics, even if it’s thankless sometimes, I did what I thought it took.  Other times, it required a lot of music, so sometimes I found myself going back to music school and doing things that I haven’t felt the need to do in a long time, which were very intense musically, contrapuntally, voice leading bunch of shit [<em>laughs</em>].  And sometimes that was because the lyrics, you know, “OK, this is the moment where the lyrics need to be matched.”  So, I kind of ran the gamut between being as simple as I’ve ever been, and sometimes having to go [Russian composer, Dmitri] Shostakovich on some of them.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/BN3.jpg"><img style="float: right; border: 3px solid black;" title="BN3" src="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/BN3-300x300.jpg" alt="BN3" width="300" height="300" /></a>Did he just send you lyrics and let you make up the music?</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">In essence, that’s what it was.  But, I welcomed Nick’s perspective and argued against it.  He sent the lyrics, and the idea was I would just write to it, but there were definitely times when he might think he heard it a little differently, I might think I needed more lyrics out of him, or wanted to cut something, and then we’d have a very friendly tug of war to try to figure it out and try to make sure it worked for both of us.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">How did you communicate?</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">Phone, email.  We never got a chance to be in the same place except for the first night we decided to do it, and I was over at his house for dinner.  We played around on his piano a little bit.  Often, I was writing on a bass guitar – a short-scale children’s bass guitar – at my computer.  That way, it was kind of like, “Here’s the lyrics.  Here’s the melody that’s coming to mind.  Let me just find the bass line.”  And keep things literally minimalist, meaning one line per voice.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Did you record most of it yourself?</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">Sometimes I did.  And, often times, the band [would record].  The band got really good touring <em>Way to Normal</em>, and it never got a chance to shine.  We went in the studio, and it was just so easy.  We really had a great thing.  The band’s tracks are very slick – like, slick in a good way.  Then, I take a week and I just pound everything out myself.  Those are a little more raw.  It was a combination of both.  When I would get sick of one, I would bounce back to the other.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">I spoke to you after your last solo album, <em>Way To Normal</em>, and you said then that it was important for you to get the sense of a live band on the record.  Did you feel the same way about this project?</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">No, because it wasn’t important to insist the feeling of a live show.  It just kind of is.  You know, if you were to buy – not that this sounds at all like a late-50s, early-60s recording – but if you were to buy, I don’t know, say something completely different from what I do, a Buddy Holly record.  That’s what it sounded like live, and that’s what it sounds like on the record, because it’s the same arrangement and the same way of looking at it, emphasizing certain parts of it.  That’s the way the live band worked for the Nick Hornby record, in that it wasn’t sort of like, “We’re a live band.  Woo hoo!”  For instance, the drummer was playing with one stick and no cymbals sometimes.  And then the percussionist was playing two bass drums and all kinds of shit.  We did what it took to turn the whole thing into a toy.  The chorus of this one song called “Levi Johnston’s Blues,” the percussionist just took it.  He just takes off with it.  It’s insane sounding.  It’s like two bass drums and marching snares just squashed to living fuck left and right, and that becomes the sound of it.  The drummer’s just sitting there, Sam’s [Smith] just sitting there playing bass drum and hi hat.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Did you notice any themes running through his lyrics that helped you write music to them?</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">Well, Nick could probably say the best, but the way it felt to me was that Nick has themes in his books, and those themes were also to be found in his lyrics.  I found certain things to be true consistently.  His way of portraying and seeing through the eyes of kids was always a certain way, a certain view.  The folly of the male psyche, how honest his characters are with you and with themselves about how fucked up they are, was present.  But, they don’t really tie in.  Some of them could have been songs that could accompany his book, <em>Juliet Naked</em>, I thought.  And he’s a big fan of pop history, so a lot of times he likes to write about that.  So, there’s a song called “Doc Pomus.”  You know, who would think to write about a songwriter from the ’60s?  It’s very cool, though.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">The whole thing kind of seems like an Elton John, Bernie Taupin type partnership.  Did it feel that way to you?</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">No, it’s like the Elton thing a little bit, except since I’ve spent my career and life poring over my own lyrics, I probably have a little different way of looking at how the music is affecting them.  I think there’s a real strength in the way that Elton can just almost disassociate himself from the lyrics.  He just sort of flies by complete intuition.  I’m more likely to look at them and really think about where was this character that day?  What does this feel like from this point of view, and what do I want to emphasize?  Sometimes if there are two opposing points of view represented in a song – like one that’s called “Claire’s 9th” – I felt there are two sides of the story.  One side could be overemphasized if it was too dramatic, and the other side could be overemphasized if it was too funny.  I work on that stuff, and I don’t know if that’s better or worse.  Probably, for your mainstream audience, it’s worse.  Probably better just to do what Elton does.  It grabs people in, and then they can think what they want.  I’m probably pushing buttons more.  That may be unique for me, because I really feel for the lyricist.  It was my mission to make sure his words spoke, and not always the way he wanted them to speak.  Sometimes writers write things they didn’t intend – almost Freudian slips.  I wanted to make sure I was on that, because here’s something I can do for him.  I can kind of show him where I thought he was coming from when he said it.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">How did the fact that you didn’t have to worry about writing lyrics change the way you wrote the music?</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">It made it a lot easier.  It also kind of forced me to use all of that extra energy and brain space just on music, so this is a more musically inventive album, even if it’s subtle.  I think it’s a more musically inventive album that what I’ve done, because that was my whole gig.  I mean, if I couldn’t get the music right, then I’m fired.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">So many of your songs tell stories, and now you’re telling someone else’s stories.  It seems like there’s a connection there.</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Ben3-Output-Stereo1.mp3" target="_blank&gt;&lt;SPAN STYLE=">*CLICK TO LISTEN*</a> That’s what I always intended to do with my career, at the beginning.  I always wanted to write things that other people would sing, and it never worked out.  I would write something and show someone how to sing it that was a better singer, and it didn’t sound right.  But, what you can do, what I really enjoy doing with people like William Shatner – it’s like, he’s got songs in him.  He’s interesting.  We can make this into songs.  Let’s see what it takes.  Get his life story, get him talking, get him writing some stuff and find it.  And the same with Nick.  There are songs in his words.  I find it really satisfying, and much more interesting, because as musical artists, we do sort of tend to run out of story, and then it becomes all about the music.  And really, so many artists have just continued to make great records, whether it’s Beck, or Radiohead or Bjork, people who have been doing it for a good fifteen years and still make great records.  I couldn’t tell you what their records are about anymore, and I doubt that they could tell you either.  And I understand.  I totally understand.  But, you take someone like William Shatner, or take anyone with a story.  I’d like to go make a record with Jesse James.  Let’s make a record, because these people have an interesting life, an interesting way of looking at it and are compelling.  Nick has written his same themes, like we all do, but since they haven’t really been expressed in music, then he gets a chance to say the same things again, do it in a different kind of verse, and then it’s fresh.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/BN11.jpg"><span style="color: #000000;"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 3px solid black;" title="BN1" src="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/BN11.jpg" alt="BN1" width="460" height="276" /></span></a></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Do you feel like you’ve run out of stories of your own?</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">It’s a shame to have the cultivated craft, talent, experience, willingness to go into the dark some to figure out where you are, and not have . . . you’ve got the vehicle.  It’s all there.  And I’m not saying I have nothing left to say, or that Bjork has nothing left to say.  But, it’s a service to be able to use that.  As soon as someone starts talking, or telling their story, or has a part of a line or anything I can imagine and put in context, suddenly I’ve got music.  I hear the arrangement, and it’s exciting.  It comes from places I wouldn’t normally think to come from, because it didn’t come from my mind.  That’s exotic territory.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">So this gives you almost a fresh perspective on songwriting in general.</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">Exactly, that’s what I mean.  I’m connected enough musically to where, if I can perceive it, if I feel a feeling out of someone’s words at all, immediately music comes to mind that sort of came from it.  I was calling myself a lyric whisperer.  It was a matter of really communicating with [Nick], and then ideas come out of your head that are not normal for me.  They’re not out of my stockpile.  My vocabulary is huge.  My stockpile is not huge because I tend to use the same vocabulary.  Like, you and I would be talking, and I’d say, “You know, you know, you know, like,” you know?  That’s going to come out.  If you had to sit down and talk to Butros Butros Gali or something, you’re going to stop that shit [<em>laughs</em>].  You’re not going to sit at the U.N. and say, “You know, you know, you know, like.”  So, it mixes it up.  I mean, I took more of a front seat than I even wanted to with the Nick one, because it essentially sounds like one of my records.  Maybe the next one I do, if I do another one with a poet, or a lyricist or a novelist, they’ll also be a musical artist that we’re actually writing for and producing.  That would be fun.</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">It seems like you’d also have a little less pressure on you since you aren’t writing the entire thing.</span></strong></p>
<p style="font-family: Times;"><span style="color: #000000;">No, and anyway, the record’s good.  In this case, it’s very cocky to say, but, if they don’t get that, then what can I do about that?  I wouldn’t change a note on it, even if nobody gets it, and I guess that’s where the confidence comes from, is knowing it works for me, it works for Nick.  We’re happy about it.  And I get to brag about it, because it’s fifty percent Nick’s, so I can brag about it fifty percent more than I ever have.</span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thrillermag.com/uncategorized/ben-folds-on-collaborating-with-nick-hornby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Ben1-Output-Stereo1.mp3" length="2993148" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Ben2-Output-Stereo1.mp3" length="3838788" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Ben3-Output-Stereo1.mp3" length="5316048" type="audio/mpeg" />
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Literature and Music - Ben Folds, Gravity's Rainbow]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Course It Happened: The Paranoid Structure of Gravity’s Rainbow</title>
		<link>http://www.thrillermag.com/uncategorized/of-course-it-happened-the-paranoid-structure-of-gravity%e2%80%99s-rainbow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thrillermag.com/uncategorized/of-course-it-happened-the-paranoid-structure-of-gravity%e2%80%99s-rainbow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thriller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thrillermag.com/?p=2801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[




Thomas Pynchon&#8217;s Gravity&#8217;s Rainbow is arguably the second-greatest work of postmodern fiction, after James Joyce&#8217;s Ulysses.  The novel is immense, impossible, breathtaking at times and aggravating at others.  By the end&#8211;for those few who can stick it out&#8211;the reader is left floored by . . .the power of Pynchon&#8217;s writing.  The man writes in sheets, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">
<div style="background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ffffff; font: normal normal normal 13px/19px Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-family: Times; line-height: normal; font-size: medium; padding: 0.6em; margin: 0px;">
<div style="background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ffffff; font: normal normal normal 13px/19px Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-family: Times; line-height: normal; font-size: medium; padding: 0.6em; margin: 0px;">
<div style="background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ffffff; font: normal normal normal 13px/19px Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-family: Times; line-height: normal; font-size: medium; padding: 0.6em; margin: 0px;">
<p><a href="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/GR2.jpg"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 2px solid black;" title="GR" src="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/GR2.jpg" alt="GR" width="566" height="809" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>Thomas Pynchon&#8217;s </em>Gravity&#8217;s Rainbow<em> is arguably the second-greatest work of postmodern fiction, after James Joyce&#8217;s </em>Ulysses<em>.  The novel is immense, impossible, breathtaking at times and aggravating at others.  By the end&#8211;for those few who can stick it out&#8211;the reader is left floored by . . .<span id="more-2801"></span>the power of Pynchon&#8217;s writing.  The man writes in sheets, torrents.  It is like listening to Coltrane at his most powerful and experimental.  One hallmark of Pynchon&#8217;s writing that occurs all throughout </em>GR<em> is the abundance of songs.  Of course, in the book they are just lyrics with no music, but the reader is meant to hear as well as read.  The work becomes musical.  Pynchon is a famous recluse.  There are only a few pictures of him in existence and he never gives interviews, leaving his persona as much a mystery as his work.  Here, </em>Thriller <em>contributor Ashley Belanger tries to make sense of it all.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Words by:  Ashley Belanger</strong></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>Gravity’s Rainbow</em> is a story set in war times, and so it seems perfectly natural for it to start off with a bomb. But that’s not exactly what happens. The screaming that’s identified in the famous first line, “A screaming comes across the sky” is not, as you might assume, the sound of a bomb falling. No, the sound of the A4, the rocket that provides the motivation for nearly every character’s actions in the story, is only heard <em>after</em> the bomb has made impact. So, if you’re hearing the bomb, the good news is, you haven’t been hit. Yet.</p>
<p>What’s interesting is that the structure of the entire novel seems to mimic this characteristic of the bomb. Imagine that the screaming of the bomb represents a linear timeline, in which you would get to hear the complete story of each character going through all the events in his life in perfect succession to be in total understanding with how they came to be who they are in the present moment. Pynchon doesn’t let his readers hear the scream until well after they’ve experienced the chaos of the current moment for that character, which, if you can humor me, is what might be considered the impact of the bomb. The impact always comes first. The screaming comes later. Try to be patient.</p>
<p>The purpose of this, in my opinion, is to instill the same paranoia in the reader as all the characters are feeling throughout the book. You aren’t supposed to totally understand a character’s purpose right at the moment of introduction, and with 400 characters in the whole beastly novel to keep track of, that’s almost a godsend. Instead, readers can react organically to the characters and form opinions naturally, the way they would if they were also part of the sordid world that Pynchon created (or narrated). Have you ever had a friend who revealed too much about a person that you were soon to meet? Suddenly, you have so much prior knowledge that you’re judging them based on someone else’s perception instead of your own. Who really wants that sort of filter?</p>
<p>So, you’re reading the book, and you’re getting these intense scenes thrust your way right and left: an octopus attacking a woman on a beach, a hijacking of a Red Cross vehicle, a humongous banana breakfast feast, and countless oversexed party scenes. And you’re terrified, the whole time: Am I not getting the point?</p>
<p>Paranoia is a major theme in this novel. It’s only right that the readers be just as nervous, with plots raining down like bombs all around them, that they might make it to the end without hearing the scream. It’s the discussion of paranoia that provides the most illumination, though, linking together the different lives and demonstrating for the reader why the examination of these characters is worth the investment of time. Pynchon explains it best in the book when he’s describing the Rorschacht inkblot test:</p>
<p>“The basic theory, is that when given an unstructured stimulus, some shapeless blob of experience, the subject, will seek to impose, structure on it. How he goes about structuring this blob will reflect his needs, his hopes— will provide, us with clues, to his dreams, fantasies, the deepest regions of his mind.”</p>
<p>It’s not that the reader is going to suddenly have access to some great personal revelation through reading this book. But if you pay attention to what there is in the book that attracts you, no matter how bizarre, disconcerting and at times completely vulgar, there’s this potential to connect in a unique way with the story that I think lacks in a lot of books that are much more straightforward.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/GR31.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2817" style="border: 2px solid black;" title="GR3" src="http://www.thrillermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/GR31-197x300.jpg" alt="GR3" width="197" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Some of the best opportunities to connect to the text come through the discussion of paranoia. And really, paranoia might be too strong a label for many people to describe the way they feel about the events in their lives. But if you’ve ever questioned a decision, if you’ve ever felt like someone was watching you, if you’ve ever worried about who was listening to your conversation, these basic feelings are explored by some of the most reprehensible people you can think of in the book, and yet you find yourself strangely pulling for them, because you’ve been there, too, in a way.</p>
<p>“. . . she is also a dweller, down inside the little city, coming awake in the very late night, blinking up into painful daylight, waiting for the annihilation, the blows from the sky, drawn terribly tense waiting, unable to name whatever it is approaching, knowing— too awful to say— it is herself, her Central Asian giantess self, that is the Nameless Thing she fears.”</p>
<p>Pynchon wants you to understand these messages so much that he literally explains it using every discipline he can find. He weaves these very easy and straightforward party scenes with in-depth references to science, math, psychology, religion, superstition, physics, and in this effort, he does a curious thing where he uses the party scenes to explain the science behind the bomb, and he uses the academic theories to explain the humanity that’s being examined in the book. At one point, he even pauses to point out that one party scene could very well be the same exact party that the reader was in earlier in the novel, which indicates just how unimportant the debauchery is and signals you to please, please pay attention to the connection Pynchon is drawing between the scenes and the science.</p>
<p>The main character, Slothrop, makes an observation late in the novel that the worst thing that can happen to a paranoid is to find out that nothing is connected. This is also the worst thing that can happen to a reader who has invested a lot of time in a very, very big book. Fortunately, Pynchon doesn’t subject readers to this fate, although he teases them with it:</p>
<p>“If there is something comforting— religious, if you want— about paranoia, there is still also anti-paranoia, where nothing is connected to anything, a condition not many of us can bear for long.”</p>
<p>As the reader moves through the novel, paranoia leads to a number of conclusions, any of which are up for grabs in order to cement the personal conclusion you want to draw. Slothrop suggests that immobility is the goal for paranoids. Simply stop moving forward and stop thinking. “So far and no farther, is that it? You call that living?” It’s also suggested that the ultimate freedom comes through isolation. “Could it be that there’s something about ad hoc arrangements, like the present mission, that must bring you in touch with the people you need to be with? That more formal adventures tend, by their nature, to separation, to loneliness?”</p>
<p>And special attention is given to silence, as the descriptions become more and more obsessed with sound at the novel’s end, which is perhaps because the characters and the readers both are growing tired of waiting to hear the sound of the screaming and almost just ready for the bomb to hit and end it all for them. It “. . . is not the usual paranoia of waiting for a knock, or a phone to ring: no, it takes a particular kind of mental illness to sit and listen for a cessation of noise.” Are we all so deranged that we could come from so many different places and still want the same thing? By the end of the book, this final connection is what brings it all together, perhaps the ultimate resolution of all that paranoia.</p>
<p>If this sounds too loosey-goosey, then the structure of this book is likely to drive you mad. By faithfully sticking to the model of impact first, followed by the scream, what Pynchon creates is this perfect moment of understanding at just the right moments during the narration, where your brain gets this fantastic reprieve from total concentration. You just have to have faith that just like the bomb, gravity will cause each character to fall eventually, and when it does, you, as the reader, are pretty much the only one left standing to put your own tune to the book’s final song.</p>
<p>With that in mind, I leave you with the most maddening of all summations any character offers in the novel: “Of course it happened. Of course it didn’t happen.”</p></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thrillermag.com/uncategorized/of-course-it-happened-the-paranoid-structure-of-gravity%e2%80%99s-rainbow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Literature and Music - Ben Folds, Gravity's Rainbow]]></series:name>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

